So be it!

Washington Examiner

Jill Stein’s running mate: ‘So be it’ if we played spoiler to Clinton

The bottom half of the Green Party’s recent presidential ticket says “so be it” if Jill Stein’s candidacy played spoiler to Democrat Hillary Clinton’s election chances.

Since the election, Stein has rejected accusations by some in the media and Clinton supporters that her campaign, which earned about 1 percent of the popular vote at nearly 1.5 million votes, helped to hand the election over to Republican Donald Trump.

During a Facebook Live discussion Tuesday night, her response to the topic remained unchanged. Stein suggested that nearly 60 percent of Green Party voters would not have come out to vote if they didn’t have a Green Party candidate for whom to vote. Furthermore, over one-third of those who would have cast a vote anyway said they would have picked Trump, Stein added.

“When you actually run the numbers, the benefit to Hillary Clinton wiping out our campaign would not have made a difference in any state,” Stein said.

Stein’s former vice presidential running mate, Ajamu Baraka, took her defensive stance on the Green Party’s impact a step further.

“I’m one that does not shy away from that notion of a spoiler,” Baraka said after Stein spoke. “We are in this struggle to build a party, to advance our interests … When you impact an election, then so be it.”

He went on to say the Green Party needs to embrace this attitude because of the threat of “pressure” that will be placed on the third-party’s future presidential ambitions to step aside.

“Whatever that means in terms of short-term politics — so be it,” Baraka said.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/jill-steins-running-mate-so-be-it-if-we-played-spoiler-to-clinton/article/2610452

Give ‘em hell, Jill!

Jill Stein went to Trump Tower on Monday to press her case for long-shot recounts in three closely contested states in last month’s presidential election.

Ms. Stein, the Green Party presidential nominee and now the leader of the recount campaign, appeared emboldened by an early morning federal court ruling that ordered Michigan elections officials — over the protests of President-elect Donald J. Trump and his allies — to begin a recount by noon Monday.

In Pennsylvania, where Ms. Stein’s bid has also faced resistance, her lawyers sued in federal court on Monday, asking a judge to order a recount on constitutional grounds. That move, an apparently last-ditch attempt to review the state’s votes, came after the recount campaign suffered a setback on Saturday when it dropped its election complaint in state court, citing costs.

After finishing a distant fourth place in the presidential election, Ms. Stein has initiated the push for recounts in the two states, as well as in Wisconsin. She has cited concerns about hacking and the reliability of voting machines, prompting legal clashes with lawyers for Mr. Trump and his allies, who see the recounts as a costly and burdensome delay tactic.

“We are here to assure Donald Trump that there is nothing to be afraid of,” Ms. Stein said during a news conference and rally with his tower as a backdrop. “If you believe in democracy, if you believe in the credibility of your victory, put down your arms, end your bureaucratic obstruction, end your intimidation.”

The president-elect, who has raised his own doubts about the election, including his claim without evidence that “millions” of people voted illegally, has chided the recount effort. On Sunday, he went on Twitterto celebrate the setback in Pennsylvania, calling the bid a “Stein scam to raise money.”

Representatives of Mr. Trump did not respond to requests for comment on Monday.

Ms. Stein raised more than $7 million for the recount costs, as some supporters of Hillary Clinton have seen the effort as a last hope to change the outcome of the Nov. 8 election. Mrs. Clinton’s campaign has played a passive role in the process, acknowledging that the margins in the three states are too much to overcome.

Kellyanne Conway, a senior adviser to Mr. Trump, said on “Fox News Sunday” that Ms. Stein should “give it up.” Ms. Conway said, “Even your friends in the Clinton campaign have admitted that these recounts will not change any results.”

But instead, Ms. Stein seemed to be redoubling the effort on Monday with just two weeks remaining before the Electoral College is set to meet and install Mr. Trump. Mrs. Clinton would need to be named the winner in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin to reverse the outcome of the election.

In Michigan, county clerks were racing to begin a recount of that state’s 4.8 million votes after an overnight federal court order concluded that waiting a few days longer might prevent the state from finishing a recount in time to meet deadlines.

The Michigan Republican Party filed notice that it planned to appeal the order, saying that state courts should decide the matter.

Mr. Trump won Michigan by 10,704 votes, and Ms. Stein has pointed to the number of people — about 75,000 — who voted in the election in Michigan but did not cast votes for president as a cause for questions.

Judge Mark Goldsmith of the United States District Court issued an order that clerks begin counting by noon Monday, sending local authorities rushing to arrange workers, meeting halls, security and other details of the recount several days earlier than had been expected.

Uncertainty about a later start date, Judge Goldsmith wrote, “shows that there is a credible threat to the voters’ right to have a determination made that Michigan’s vote for president was properly tabulated.”

Judge Goldsmith was nominated to the court by President Obama.

Officials in at least two counties were prepared to begin at noon, elections officials said, one at a county fairgrounds, the other in a school district facility.

But the fate of a recount in Michigan, which Republicans in the state have described as needless and expensive, remains tangled in additional litigation in other courts.

In Pennsylvania, Ms. Stein’s lawyers turned their focus to the federal courts, filing a motion seeking an order for a recount and a forensic examination of voting machines.

Last week, lawyers for the Republican Party of Pennsylvania and Mr. Trump countered an election challenge filed by Ms. Stein’s lawyers in state court, saying that Ms. Stein had not found fraud or illegality in the election. Ms. Stein’s lawyers dropped that claim on Saturday, citing a court order to pay a $1 million bond to proceed.

In federal court papers, lawyers for Ms. Stein wrote that a close accounting of votes was necessary in Pennsylvania because the state’s election system was “a national disgrace” that forced voters to use “vulnerable, hackable, antiquated technology banned in other states,” without a paper trail.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/05/us/jill-stein-takes-long-shot-recount-campaign-to-trump-tower.html?_r=0

Presente!

Jill Stein praises Fidel Castro: ‘A symbol of the struggle for justice’

“Fidel Castro was a symbol of the struggle for justice in the shadow of empire. Presente!” Stein wrote on Twitter Saturday afternoon.

Fidel Castro was a symbol of the struggle for justice in the shadow of empire. Presente!

The Tweet came on the heel of other pro-Castro remarks Stein had made in an interview with Paste Magazine.

Castro’s death Friday, she told the pop culture magazine “feels like the passing of an era of incredible struggle against empire right across the water—whether you live in Haiti or in Cuba or even much of the rest of South America, there’s been a real struggle for social justice and it’s been very difficult.

“Cuba was in many ways the face of that movement, which continues to this day.”

Jill filed for the WI recount on Friday:

Jill Stein: Why I should be in the debates

Jill Stein: Why I should be in the debates

USA TODAY Jill Stein7:09 p.m. EDT September 22, 2016

 

Largest group of voters are independents. Four candidates should be included.

According to USA TODAY, 76% of voters want four-candidate debates. Voters need to know all their options and see all candidates debating on a wide range of issues. Every candidate who could win a majority of the electoral college should be included.

The Democrats and Republicans should not exclude their competitors. The debate commission is a deception created by the parties to keep competition out. It undermines democracy for two parties to silence their competition. In 1988, the League of Women Voters warned the parties would “perpetrate a fraud on the American voter” and refused to be “an accessory to the hoodwinking of the American public.”

The debates will ignore critical issues. I am the only candidate who does not take corporate donations or have a super PAC and therefore can represent the people.

No other candidate has a plan to end the debt of Millennials, who are unable to participate in the economy because of unfair college tuition.

No other candidate will bring the rule of law to Wall Street and break up big banks.

High-quality health care through an improved Medicare for all is only supported by me.

Only I discuss systemic racism — not only police violence and mass incarceration but also economic and environmental injustice.

I’m the only candidate urging a World War II-style mobilization to confront climate change, creating a clean-energy economy and an emergency jobs program.

These are some of the many issues, supported by majorities of U.S. voters, that will not be discussed with only two candidates debating.

Democrats and Republicans nominated the two most unpopular candidates in history, both parties are shrinking, and the largest group of voters are independents. Four candidates should be included.

The central issue of our time — the crisis of democracy — will not be discussed. Is this a country dominated by people or corporations? Do people rule or does money?

The two parties represent the interests of corporations and money and should not be able to keep out competition. A country ruled by the people demands open debates.

Jill Stein is the Green Party nominee for president of the United States

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/09/22/jill-stein-presidential-debate-editorials-debates/90865372/

  Dorćol Distilling Co. Debate Watch

(“Dorchals”) at 1902 S.Flores have invited us to their Brewery Cafe for a Monday Sept 26 Debate Watch Party. Offered space for us to table Jill Stein material.

The debate will run from 9 to 10:30 pm EDT at Hofstra University in Hempstead, New York. That is 8 to 9:30 CDT here in Texas. Various streams will kick in at 7:30. Plan to be at Dorćol by @ 7:00 pm.

Greens vs Democrats

Six in ten Americans say a major third party is needed, citing disappointment in representation from Republicans and Democrats. There are more than 100 Green Party candidates running for office and they face similar challenges in local elections as in the presidential. Candidates are called ‘spoilers’ in elections from dog catcher to President and they face major fundraising obstacles as a result of their refusal to accept special interest money that fuels the two corporate parties. Due to a series of Supreme Court decisions from Buckley v. Valeo to Citizens Unitedmoney has replaced the vote in American politics and economic power directly builds political power (which, conveniently, directly builds more economic power). The two major parties dominate elections at all levels through aggressive fundraising, with reliance on special interest money to do so, and leveraging the brand awareness of their established reputations, with more than a century to get a “head start.”

Each of the candidates below is facing off a Democrat that leaves much desired for progressives and each follows the “Ten Key Values” of The Green Party. To build political power across the nation, third parties need support at the local, state, and national levels. Consistently voting for andsupporting Green Party candidates can quell its primary criticism over time, but it will require a new level of engagement, volunteerism, investment, and potential risk-taking — one similar to the evident effort in Bernie Sanders’ bid for the Democratic Party’s nomination for President.

SENATE

 

 

Dr. Margaret Flowers | Maryland Senate

In a move exemplary of the populism Dr. Margaret Flowers campaigns on, if elected, she has stated she will only accept the median Maryland income — approx. $69,000 — and will donate the rest — approx. $100,000 per year — to growing social movements needed to gain popular support for reforms in Washington. Flowers will also reject her personal health care plan from Congress until all people have access.Talk about walking the walk. After graduating from the University of Maryland School of Medicine, Dr. Flowers completed her pediatric residency at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore. She stopped practicing medicine to become a full-time social and environmental justice advocate, with roots grown deep in single-payer healthcare. Flowers is an ardent activist of the commons — fighting to see healthcare, natural resources, and government representation restored to people who would be empowered by their return. She is co-director of the organization It’s Our Economy, acting leadership or active member of environmentalorganizations and economic justice groups, as well as co-host of a public radio show called Clearing the FOG. Flowers is running for retiring Democratic incumbent Senator Barbara Mikulski’s (D) ‘Safe Democrat’ seat in a three-way race most notably against establishment darling Representative Chris Van Hollen (D), who has raised nearly $10 million in his campaign, with large individual and PAC money equaling more than 75 percent of his contributions.

 

 

 

Arn Menconi | Colorado Senate

Two-time county commissioner Arn Menconi is running for a Democrat-favored seat in Colorado. Menconi is a 25-year Colorado resident, has invested in the local community with his non-profit SOS Outreach and holds an MBA from the University of Denver. Menconi has an opportunity to draw disillusioned Democrats from a pro-fracking, pro-Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) corporate-friendly incumbent — Senator Michael Bennet (D) — who earned public rebuke from the Colorado AFL-CIO and protests at his 2016 campaign kickoff event for his support of the controversial Keystone XL Pipeline. Domestic, environmental and foreign policy issues are seeing peak awareness thanks to Bernie Sanders’ campaign for President and Menconi’s stance on free public college, single-payer healthcare, reducing income inequality with a $15 minimum wage, and ‘reversing’ empire-building U.S. foreign policy standards present a true progressive option in one of the most progressive states in the country. Menconi is up against high odds as Senator Bennet has$14.5 million in his campaign war chest, 80 percent of which came from outside the state of Colorado.

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

 

 

Matt Funiciello | Congressional District 21 in New York

When Matt Funiciello announced his run for Congress, he knew he was up against what he has called “the year of the outsider in CD21” — referring to out-of-district candidates who are “air-dropped” in to win seats with the help of high-rolling supporters. In 2014, he took 11 percent of the vote and, this year, he was endorsed by Ralph Nader, who appropriately deemed him “Democracy’s Baker.” Funiciello is a community activist and working man as the owner of local favorite Rock Hill Bakehouse in Glens Falls. He is up against two well-fundedRepublican and Democrat ‘carpetbaggers,’ who have each criticized the other for not being from the district. Republican incumbent Representative Elise Stefanik has raised $2.2 million for re-election, with significant contributions from corporate donors. Funiciello has proven he wants to be a true public servant through the oft-thankless work of activism. He is currently polling at 20 percent and the seat has been deemed ‘one to watch’ by national political forecasters. In his endorsement of Funiciello, Nader said, “We look at the world through business eyes, we need to look through civic eyes.”

 

 

Vanessa Tijerina | Congressional District 15 in Texas

Vanessa Tijerina is challenging for a ‘Safe Democrat’ seat in the Rio Grande Valley in South Texas. Tijerina has been a nurse for nearly 20 years and is an activist in her community for progressive issues. When interviewed by Texas MonthlyTijerina said Bernie’s campaign for President is what inspired her to run for office and go to law school. She was a young, single mother who, at one point in her life, relied on government assistance and, in a speech rallying community support for Bernie Sanders, said, “I have walked in the same shoes as many of you. I’m a real person living with issues that our current government refuses to address and many issues they refuse to acknowledge even exist.”

 

 

 

Daniel Vila | Congressional District 13 in New York

In 2014, lifelong labor, peace and community activist Daniel Vila received more than 10 percent of the vote in his run for the House of Representatives. That same year, more than 14.8 percent of voters turned in blank or void ballots, presumably in protest of limited choices as Vila faced off against incumbent Representative Charles Rangel (D), who will be vacating his seat this year. Vila studied at City University of New York and has worked with numerous activist organizations including Latino Workers Center, the NYC Coalition for Peace and Justice, and the American Postal Workers Union. Vila’s progressive platform includes ending corporate welfare, investing in free public education from pre-Kindergarten through college, single-payer healthcare, a $15 minimum wage, and restoring labor unions. Vila will work to see the end of deportation for undocumented immigrants and the end of police brutality with a major reform of the criminal justice system.

 

 

 

Kamesha Clark | Congressional District 4 in Maryland

Kamesha Clark is running in Representative Donna Edwards’ district after Edwards ran for Senate in lieu of re-election for her seat in the House. Clark is 25 years old and her campaign has gone above-and-beyond to recognize Millennial voters with the creation of a ‘Millennial General Assembly.’ Clark wants to offer much-needed resources to communities in need and help her district transition to a sustainable one with zero waste. She traveled to Philadelphia to take part in the protests of the Democratic National Convention along with Dr. Jill Stein.

 

 

 

Nancy Wallace | Congressional District 8 in Maryland

Nancy Wallace is a political science graduate from Yale University and environmental activist with a long history of effective civil disobedience. After joining protesters in Norway to occupy a reindeer migration path in temperatures as low as minus 20 degrees Fahrenheit, she spent 14 years lobbying Washington to protect endangered species and support family planning initiatives. Wallace spent four years as Sierra Club’s Washington Director and she definitely ‘walks the walk’ — her house is sustainably powered exclusively by wind energy.

 

 

 

Paul Pipkin | Congressional District 20 in Texas

Paul Pipkin left the Democratic Party in 1998 after he led The Progressive Democrats of San Antonio for a decade. More recently, he served as co-chair of the Steering Committee for the national Green Party. Pipkin has worked in labor and political activism for more than 50 years, most recently marching with Occupy and supporting Occupier-candidates during his race for office in 2012, when he took 8,500 votes against an establishment Democrat challenger. The last time congressional District 20 in Texas supported a Republican for President was 1956, when Republicans ‘were’ Democrats before the parties flipped during the Civil Rights Movement. Democratic incumbent Representative Joaquin Castro is an establishment Democrat with a twin brother serving in President Barack Obama’s administration.

 

 

 

Robert Lee Worthey | Congressional District 6 in Colorado

Robert Lee Worthey is running for the seat of Republican incumbent Representative Mike Coffman, who has held the seat since 2008. During Coffman’s first election to the House in 2008, he was accused as then-Secretary of State of improperly marking 6,400 voter registration formsas incomplete and government accountability organization Common Cause filed suit. Coffman is supported by Koch brothers’ Americans for Prosperity, pledging a six-figure effort to attack Carroll. Coffman’s Political Director JD Key spoke to The Colorado Statesman about Democratic challenger state Senator Morgan Carroll, “Feel the Bern? Voters hungry for an outsider — someone to challenge partisanship and gridlock in Washington D.C. — will take a close look at Senator Carroll’s record of partisanship and gridlock and get heartburn.” The attack is likely hyperbole, considering the source, however, Carroll did toe the linebetween Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton in the Democratic presidential primary. In contrast with the two primary party challengers, Worthey understands the challenges of student debt and the political disenfranchisement of Millennials that results. He is campaigning on progressive reform of the criminal justice system, free public college and health care as human rights, and practical campaign finance reform to get money out of politics.

 

 

 

Paula Bradshaw | Congressional District 12 in Illinois

Nearly half of the representatives in Congress listed ‘business’ as their professional background at the start of the (current) 114th Congress. In Illinois, Paula Bradshaw says we need to stop running America like it’s a business and start making government work for the people. In 2014, Bradshaw took 6 percent of the vote and Republican Representative Mike Bost was elected to his first term in the House of Representatives. Bost made national news last year when a video of a ‘rant’ on the House floor went viral. Democratic challenger C.J. Baricevic faced detractors from the national party with The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reporting ofsomething fishy going on with his campaign finance records. Regarding her opponents in the race, in an interview with St. Louis Public Radio,Bradshaw stated“The other two are so much alike that there’s no real choice.  They’re both for coal. They’re both for war. They’re both for fracking. I’m the only one that’s different.”

“It’s time to stand up and fight for our country because we are under assault, even if they don’t frame it like that. But what if it was terrorists poisoning our water supply? What if it was a foreign government who overthrew our Bill of Rights and spied on our every move? What if it was street criminals instead of banking criminals throwing Americans out of their houses? [...] We’re told every day that America is most under threat from small groups of armed men thousands of miles away overseas, but in the meantime, right here at home, America is sinking into poverty and repression. [...] And the actual country — the land, the water, the trees, the forests, the oceans — are being stripped for parts by a small group of people right here at home.”  — Paula Bradshaw

 

 

Gary Stuard | Congressional District 32 in Texas

Social worker, “proud union member,” and activist Gary Stuard is a native Texan running to represent North Texas district 32. Stuard graduated Summa Cum Laude from the University of Houston and later received a Masters of Social Work from his alma mater. A student of Buddhist monk Thich Nhat Hanh, Stuard has been awarded the Peace Award from the Houston Peace Center. He married his partner of 10 years after the Supreme Court ruled in favor of marriage equality. No Democrat candidate filed to oppose Republican incumbent Pete Sessions. Sessions was famed for claiming Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake were forcing liberal values on America with half-nudity at a halftime show and subsequently spending thousands to host fundraisers at burlesque clubs. More recently, he blamed now daily occurrences of gun violence on “diversity in America.” He has raised just under $2 million in his race for re-election, with only 1 percent of total funds from small individual contributors. Four of his his top five contributor categories include commercial banks, real estate, oil and gas and securities and investments. It’s only apropos that Stroud has proudly claimed to be the candidate for the 99 percent — yin to the yang of Sessions’ stark lack of support from the lower, working and middle classes. Sessions has a 0 percent rating from the AFL-CIO, denies climate change, voted against the last minimum wage increase and supported the fast-track of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). In contrast, Stuard strongly supports unions, a path to citizenship, increasing the minimum wage to $15 and strongly opposes the TPP.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/top-10-greens-running-for-congress-in-2016_us_57c87ea9e4b06c750dd9122a